A two-minute product tour · Forensic Vocational Rehabilitation

See the finished report—and the proof behind every line

Disclosed. turns the expert's confirmed findings into one connected package: the report, its sentence-level evidence map, the AI-use disclosure, and a record anyone can independently verify. Open only the detail you want to inspect.

Fictional matter for demonstration. No real party, expert, or data.

What Disclosed. produced

One workflow. Four connected deliverables.

Generated together—not reconstructed later
Rule 26(a)(2)(B): all elements present

Deliverable 1 + 2

Report + evidence map

Open a section to inspect its text and source links.

17 evidence-linked sections
Matter
Alvarez v. Brightline Mechanical Servs., No. 2025-CV-04417
Retaining counsel
Hahn & Castro LLP (Plaintiff)
Expert
Dana M. Whitfield, M.S., CRC, ABVE/D
Role
Vocational rehabilitation & earning-capacity expert
Summary of OpinionsAwaiting your input
The permanent restriction against lifting over 25 pounds and sustained overhead work removes Mr. Alvarez's pre-injury occupation as a commercial HVAC installer from his reach 4. He retains the capacity for full-time work at the sedentary-to-light exertional level, with skills that transfer most readily to service-dispatch, parts-and-inventory, and customer-service occupations identified through a transferable-skills analysis 7. His documented pre-injury earning capacity averaged approximately $72,400 per year 5, while the directly accessible post-injury occupations surveyed in his labor market pay approximately $44,000 to $52,000 per year 8. [Expert input needed: state the adopted post-injury earning capacity and the resulting annual loss of earning capacity; the present value of the lifetime loss is to be calculated by the retained economist.]
Labor Market SurveyAwaiting your input
To assess placeability, a labor market survey was conducted within Mr. Alvarez's commuting area, defined as an approximately 35-mile radius of his residence 8. Current openings were researched through online job boards and employer websites, and selected employers were contacted directly to verify wages and physical requirements 8. The survey returned dispatcher, parts-and-inventory, and customer-service openings paying approximately $44,000 to $52,000 per year, each documented with its source and date in Exhibit A 8.
Pre-Injury vs. Post-Injury Earning CapacityCited to your evidence
Pre-injury, Mr. Alvarez possessed the capacity to earn approximately $72,400 per year as an experienced commercial HVAC installer, consistent with the upper range of prevailing wages for that trade 5. Post-injury, within the occupations that remain directly accessible given his adopted restrictions and transferable skills, his earning capacity ranges from approximately $44,000 to $52,000 per year 8. These ranges are corroborated by O*NET-SOC classifications and Bureau of Labor Statistics occupational wage data for the relevant occupations 9. Earning capacity is expressed as a range because it reflects the band of occupations a worker can realistically access and perform, not a single guaranteed wage 8.
OpinionsAwaiting your input
Based upon the expert's education, training, and experience, the interview and testing of Mr. Alvarez, the records identified in this report, and the methodology described above, the following opinions are held to a reasonable degree of vocational-rehabilitation certainty 4. First, the adopted permanent restrictions preclude Mr. Alvarez from returning to his past relevant work as a commercial HVAC installer 4. Second, he retains the capacity for full-time sedentary-to-light work in the service-dispatch, parts-and-inventory, and customer-service occupations identified by the transferable-skills analysis 7. Third, his post-injury earning capacity falls within the surveyed range of approximately $44,000 to $52,000 per year 8, reduced from a documented pre-injury average of approximately $72,400 per year 5. [Expert input needed: state the adopted post-injury earning capacity and the resulting annual loss of earning capacity, and confirm the work-life expectancy and present-value multiplier with the retained economist before stating a total discounted loss figure.]
Browse the other 16 report sectionsProfile, methodology, factual background, bases, and exhibits
Referral and AssignmentCited to your evidence
Hahn & Castro LLP retained the expert to evaluate Mr. Alvarez's post-injury employability, vocational options, and earning capacity following the work-related injury to his lumbar spine 1. The assignment was limited to vocational and earning-capacity questions and did not extend to any opinion on medical causation, impairment rating, or the present value of any loss 1. Each opinion in this report is offered to a reasonable degree of vocational-rehabilitation certainty and is subject to amendment should additional records become available 1.
Identifying Data and BackgroundCited to your evidence
Mr. Alvarez is 47 years old and testified that he worked as a commercial HVAC installer for approximately fourteen years before the incident, a skilled trade classified at the medium-to-heavy exertional level 2. His reported duties included rooftop unit installation and overhead ductwork requiring sustained lifting and overhead reaching 2. His pre-injury W-2 earnings averaged approximately $72,400 per year over the four years preceding the injury 5.
Records ReviewedCited to your evidence
Engagement letter and scope of retention 1.Plaintiff deposition testimony 2.Vocational interview notes 3.Treating physician's permanent work restrictions 4.Pre-injury wage and W-2 records 5.Vocational testing results 6.Transferable-skills analysis output 7.Labor market survey of the commuting area 8.O*NET and BLS occupational wage data 9.Retraining program cost and duration estimate 10.
Interview and Vocational EvaluationCited to your evidence
During the clinical vocational interview, Mr. Alvarez reported persistent low-back pain that limits prolonged standing, repetitive bending, and overhead reaching 3. He stated that he has not returned to any paid work since the injury and completes household activities only with self-pacing and rest breaks 3. These self-reported tolerances are recorded as self-report and are consistent with the permanent restrictions documented by the treating physician 4.
Vocational TestingCited to your evidence
The Wide Range Achievement Test, Fifth Edition (WRAT-5) was administered to assess functional academic skills relevant to retraining and reentry 6. Mr. Alvarez obtained a Word Reading standard score of 98, at approximately a 10.1 grade equivalent, and a Math Computation standard score of 95, at approximately a 9.2 grade equivalent 6. These results place his academic skills in the average range and indicate that short-term vocational retraining is feasible 6.
Functional and Residual CapacityAwaiting your input
For purposes of this evaluation the expert adopts the permanent work restrictions imposed by the treating physician: no lifting over 25 pounds and no sustained overhead work 4. As a vocational-rehabilitation counselor the expert does not render medical opinions, but accepts these restrictions as the functional baseline for the analysis that follows 4. Translated into vocational terms, these restrictions limit Mr. Alvarez to work at or below the light exertional level and preclude the sustained overhead reaching characteristic of HVAC installation 4.
Transferable Skills AnalysisCited to your evidence
A transferable-skills analysis was conducted in the OASYS occupational access system, matching the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) worker-trait factors of Mr. Alvarez's past relevant work, namely its specific vocational preparation (SVP), general educational development (GED), aptitudes, and work fields, against the universe of occupations and filtering by his adopted restrictions 7. The analysis identified service-dispatch, parts-and-inventory, customer-service, and maintenance-scheduling occupations as closely transferable and within his residual capacity, with cost-estimating and technical-sales occupations transferable given brief additional training 7. Each identified occupation's DOT profile was cross-walked to its current O*NET-SOC classification, and the wage data verified against Bureau of Labor Statistics figures 9. The transferable-skills detail, with SVP and exertional levels, is set out in Exhibit B 7.
Rehabilitation PlanCited to your evidence
The recommended rehabilitation plan consists of vocational counseling, a short certificate program in mechanical estimating, job-seeking-skills training, and structured job-placement assistance 10. The estimating certificate is estimated at approximately four months and $6,200 in tuition and materials, and would support transition into higher-paying estimator roles over time 10. Even with these services, Mr. Alvarez's realistic near-term reemployment is into occupations paying materially less than his pre-injury skilled-trade wage 10.
Labor Force Participation and Work-LifeAwaiting your input
The adopted restrictions do not preclude full-time work within Mr. Alvarez's residual capacity 4. He reported both the intention and the ability to work full time in a suitable, accommodated role 3. [Expert input needed: state whether and how the evaluee's work-life participation or work-life expectancy is reduced, and identify the source relied on (for example, a work-life-expectancy table such as Skoog-Ciecka-Krueger or BLS increment-decrement data), or expressly defer the work-life reduction to the retained economist.]
Loss of Earning CapacityAwaiting your input
The documented pre-injury earning capacity averaged approximately $72,400 per year 5, while the directly accessible post-injury occupations pay approximately $44,000 to $52,000 per year 8.
Basis and ReasonsCited to your evidence
Each opinion rests on identified facts and data applied through the RAPEL methodology, a published and widely used framework in forensic vocational rehabilitation 4. The basis for the reduced capacity is the permanent physical restriction that removes the pre-injury occupation from reach 4. The redirection occupations and their wage range are grounded in the transferable-skills analysis and the local labor market survey 7 8, and corroborated against government occupational wage data 9. The loss of earning capacity follows from the difference between the documented pre-injury earnings and the expert's adopted post-injury earning capacity within the surveyed wage range 5 8.
Facts or Data ConsideredCited to your evidence
Engagement letter and scope of retention 1.Plaintiff's deposition testimony regarding work history 2.Vocational interview and self-reported limitations 3.Treating physician's permanent work restrictions 4.Pre-injury wage and W-2 records 5.Vocational testing results 6.Transferable-skills analysis output 7.Labor market survey of the local commuting area 8.O*NET and BLS occupational wage data 9.Retraining program cost and duration estimate 10.
ExhibitsCited to your evidence
Exhibit A: labor market survey of dispatcher, parts-and-inventory, and customer-service openings in the commuting area, with the source and date for each data point 8.Exhibit B: transferable-skills analysis occupation list, with O*NET-SOC classifications, specific vocational preparation, and exertional levels 7.Exhibit C: pre-injury versus post-injury earning-capacity comparison, with Bureau of Labor Statistics occupational wage benchmarks 5 9.The full exhibit tables are attached following the certification 9.
QualificationsProfile content
Dana M. Whitfield, M.S., CRC, ABVE/D. Diplomate of the American Board of Vocational Experts and a Certified Rehabilitation Counselor with relevant publications within the last ten years, as listed in the attached curriculum vitae.
Prior Testimony (Last 4 Years)Profile content
Reyes v. Coastal Freight (2024) — deposition and trial testimony.In re Okafor (2023) — deposition testimony.
Statement of CompensationProfile content
$295 per hour for file review and report preparation; $450 per hour for deposition and trial testimony. Compensation is not contingent on the opinions expressed or the outcome of the matter.

Private review

Never saved

What still needs the expert?

Disclosed. separates actual open inputs from optional methodology prompts, so the expert sees the next decision instead of a wall of checklist text.

20

sections checked

10

records traced

6

sections awaiting expert input

Every supplied record is used in an analysis section.

Open items to resolve

  • Your input“Summary of Opinions” has an open “[Expert input needed]” item — supply it before you finalize?
  • Your input“Functional and Residual Capacity” has an open “[Expert input needed]” item — supply it before you finalize?
  • Your input“Labor Market Survey” has an open “[Expert input needed]” item — supply it before you finalize?
  • Your input“Labor Force Participation and Work-Life” has an open “[Expert input needed]” item — supply it before you finalize?
  • Your input“Loss of Earning Capacity” has an open “[Expert input needed]” item — supply it before you finalize?
  • Your input“Opinions” has an open “[Expert input needed]” item — supply it before you finalize?
Optional methodology review23 neutral prompts across 12 topics · 1 phrases were not detected

These are prompts, not failed checks. The tool asks about completeness; the expert decides what applies and what to conclude.

Referral and Assignment2 prompts ↓
  • Is the retaining party and the precise referral question stated?
  • Is the date of the assignment or evaluation given?
Identifying Data and Background3 prompts ↓
  • Is the evaluee's age stated?
  • Is the relevant labor market (commuting area) identified?
  • Is the pre-injury occupation's exertional level stated?
Interview and Vocational Evaluation2 prompts ↓
  • Is the date and method of the clinical interview stated?not detected
  • Are self-reported limitations attributed as self-report (not adopted findings)?
Vocational Testing1 prompt ↓
  • Are the instruments named and scores reported with their metrics (standard score / percentile / grade equivalent)?
Functional and Residual Capacity4 prompts ↓
  • Is the source of each adopted restriction identified (treating physician / FCE / IME)?
  • Are the restrictions translated into exertional terms?
  • Are pre-existing or coexisting conditions addressed and, where relevant, the vocational loss apportioned from any prior condition?
  • Is any conclusion that the evaluee cannot work in the future tied to a physician/FCE opinion rather than the vocational expert's own medical judgment?
Transferable Skills Analysis2 prompts ↓
  • Is the TSA method and data source disclosed (e.g., OASYS / DOT / O*NET)?
  • Where DOT worker traits (SVP/GED) are relied on, is the DOT-to-O*NET-SOC cross-walk addressed (the DOT, not O*NET, is the source of SVP/GED)?
Labor Market Survey3 prompts ↓
  • Is the commuting-area radius defined?
  • Are the survey's employer data points documented with their source and date?
  • Is the expert's real-world hireability (placeability) judgment stated, distinct from mere job availability?
Pre-Injury vs. Post-Injury Earning Capacity1 prompt ↓
  • Are pre- and post-injury earning capacities expressed as ranges with their sources?
Labor Force Participation and Work-Life1 prompt ↓
  • Is work-life expectancy addressed, or expressly deferred to the economist?
Loss of Earning Capacity1 prompt ↓
  • Is present-value/discounting expressly left to the forensic economist?
Opinions2 prompts ↓
  • Is each opinion stated to a reasonable degree of vocational-rehabilitation certainty?
  • Does each opinion reflect your own independent analysis, rather than a restatement of another's conclusion?
Basis and Reasons1 prompt ↓
  • Is each opinion tied to a recognized methodology and the underlying data (Daubert reliability)?

Nothing in this review is logged, exported, or recorded in the AI-Disclosure Appendix.

Supporting detail

3 structured report exhibits

Included in the exported report
Exhibit A — Labor Market Survey — Commuting AreaWithin an approximately 35-mile commuting radius. Illustrative survey for this sample matter; wages corroborated against BLS OEWS (May 2024).

Exhibit A — Labor Market Survey — Commuting Area

#Employer / sourcePositionReported annual wageBasis
1Regional commercial HVAC contractorService Dispatcher / Scheduler$46,000–$50,000Phone verification, 5/2026
2HVAC/R wholesale distributorInside Customer Service / Parts$44,500 + bonusJob posting, verified 5/2026
3Mechanical contractor (commercial)Parts & Inventory Coordinator$48,000–$52,000Phone verification, 5/2026
4Facilities-management firmMaintenance Planner / Scheduler$49,200Careers-page posting, 5/2026
5Building-automation distributorService Coordinator / Dispatcher$45,760Job posting, verified 5/2026
6HVAC equipment supplierCustomer Service / Order Desk$44,000–$47,500Phone verification, 5/2026

Each contact is documented with its date and source in the labor-market-contact log.

Exhibit B — Transferable Skills Analysis — Accessible OccupationsOASYS transferable-skills analysis, cross-referenced to the DOT and O*NET, with the adopted physical restrictions applied as filters.

Exhibit B — Transferable Skills Analysis — Accessible Occupations

#OccupationO*NET-SOCSVPStrengthWithin restriction
1HVAC service dispatcher / scheduler43-50324SedentaryYes
2Parts & inventory / planning clerk43-50714LightYes
3Customer service rep (HVAC distributor)43-40514SedentaryYes
4Maintenance planner / scheduler43-50614Sedentary–LightYes
5Cost estimator (mechanical)13-10517SedentaryWith retraining
6Technical sales rep (HVAC equipment)41-40117LightWith brief OJT

O*NET-SOC codes per the 2018 SOC / O*NET-SOC 2019 taxonomy. SVP = Specific Vocational Preparation.

Exhibit C — Pre-Injury vs. Post-Injury Earning CapacityEarning capacity expressed as ranges. Pre-injury documented earnings fall in the upper percentiles for SOC 49-9021.

Exhibit C — Pre-Injury vs. Post-Injury Earning Capacity

MeasurePre-injuryPost-injury (accessible cluster)
Representative occupationCommercial HVAC installerDispatcher · parts/inventory · service CSR
O*NET-SOC49-902143-5032 · 43-5071 · 43-4051
BLS OEWS median (national, 5/2024)$59,810$42,830 – $57,770
Earning capacity (this matter)≈ $72,400 / yr (documented)$44,000 – $52,000 / yr (surveyed)

BLS OEWS May 2024. Present value of any loss to be computed by the retained forensic economist.

Deliverable 3

The AI-use record is built while the report is built

No reconstruction from memory: each assisted section carries the model, version, and evidence it received.

Generated automatically

This report was prepared with the assistance of an AI tool that organizes and formats the expert's own findings into the report structure. The drafting instructions restrict the model to the evidence the expert supplied, valid citation markers can identify only evidence IDs supplied for the report, and a missing or unknown marker is flagged. A valid marker records source linkage; it does not independently prove that the source is accurate or supports the sentence. The expert reviewed, verified, edited, and adopted all content of this report and is solely responsible for every fact and opinion stated herein. The following record discloses each AI-assisted section, the model and version used, and the evidence provided to it.

17

logged section events

1

model/version recorded

Travels with the report

as its disclosure appendix

Inspect the full disclosure log17 events · claude-sonnet-4-5 (claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929)
SectionModel · versionEvidence provided
scope of assignmentclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Engagement letter ¶2
summary of opinionsclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Dr. Reyes, M.D. — Permanent Restrictions p.3; OASYS TSA run, 2026-05-12; W-2 records 2019–2022; Labor market survey, Tbl. 2
backgroundclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Depo. p.18 ln.4–12; W-2 records 2019–2022
records reviewedclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Engagement letter ¶2; Depo. p.18 ln.4–12; Voc. interview p.2; Dr. Reyes, M.D. — Permanent Restrictions p.3; W-2 records 2019–2022; Voc. eval. p.5; OASYS TSA run, 2026-05-12; Labor market survey, Tbl. 2; O*NET-SOC / BLS OEWS, May 2024; Rehab plan worksheet
interviewclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Voc. interview p.2; Dr. Reyes, M.D. — Permanent Restrictions p.3
vocational testingclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Voc. eval. p.5
functional capacityclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Dr. Reyes, M.D. — Permanent Restrictions p.3
transferable skillsclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929OASYS TSA run, 2026-05-12; O*NET-SOC / BLS OEWS, May 2024
labor market surveyclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Labor market survey, Tbl. 2
rehabilitation planclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Rehab plan worksheet
earning capacityclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929W-2 records 2019–2022; Labor market survey, Tbl. 2; O*NET-SOC / BLS OEWS, May 2024
labor force participationclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Dr. Reyes, M.D. — Permanent Restrictions p.3; Voc. interview p.2
loss of earning capacityclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929W-2 records 2019–2022; Labor market survey, Tbl. 2
opinionsclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Dr. Reyes, M.D. — Permanent Restrictions p.3; Labor market survey, Tbl. 2; W-2 records 2019–2022; OASYS TSA run, 2026-05-12
basis and reasonsclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Dr. Reyes, M.D. — Permanent Restrictions p.3; OASYS TSA run, 2026-05-12; Labor market survey, Tbl. 2; W-2 records 2019–2022; O*NET-SOC / BLS OEWS, May 2024
facts or data consideredclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Engagement letter ¶2; Depo. p.18 ln.4–12; Voc. interview p.2; Dr. Reyes, M.D. — Permanent Restrictions p.3; W-2 records 2019–2022; Voc. eval. p.5; OASYS TSA run, 2026-05-12; Labor market survey, Tbl. 2; O*NET-SOC / BLS OEWS, May 2024; Rehab plan worksheet
exhibitsclaude-sonnet-4-5 · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Labor market survey, Tbl. 2; OASYS TSA run, 2026-05-12; W-2 records 2019–2022; O*NET-SOC / BLS OEWS, May 2024

Profile sections authored directly by the expert make no AI calls, so they do not appear in the disclosure log.

Deliverable 4

The record does not require trust in our label

The sample's AI-disclosure record is a SHA-256 hash chain: alter a single entry and every entry after it stops matching. Recompute it in your own browser, with no account and no upload. The verifier includes a doctored copy so you can watch the check fail.

See what Disclosed. produces · Disclosed.