For firms & teams

One sanctioned tool for your whole practice

If you run a practice with more than one expert, the AI question is already in your office, whether or not you've decided how to answer it.

The shadow-AI problem you may already have

Some of your experts are probably already pasting deposition excerpts, medical records, and case notes into a public chatbot to speed up a report. That's case material, often under a protective order, leaving your control with no record of what was used or how. It's a confidentiality exposure and a disclosure exposure at once, and you'd learn about it on cross-examination.

What a practice gets from doing it in the open

One tool everyone uses the same way: each expert's own findings structured into your standard format, every factual sentence cited to a source they supplied, and an automatic AI-Use Disclosure record attached to each report. Nothing is originated for them, and each expert remains the author of their own report. Instead of hoping no one used AI badly, you have a consistent, disclosable record that AI was used carefully, or not at all, since there is a no-AI mode.

Where this is today, honestly

The product works now for an individual expert. Team features are on the roadmap, not built yet: shared billing, a firm-tuned template, and visibility into usage across your experts. We're onboarding a small number of firms as design partners to shape them. If that's you, the fastest path is a conversation, not a checkout.

Informational only; not legal advice and not a representation about any specific matter. Disclosed. is in early access and is not a law firm.