What this tool does in your expert's workflow

The tool works only from the evidence the expert supplies, and does not reach outside it for facts, figures, or citations. Every factual sentence must carry a citation to a source the expert provided, and export is blocked on any sentence that cannot be tied to one. That check confirms a sentence points to a real supplied source. It does not confirm the source proves the statement, so verifying that the evidence actually supports each sentence, and that any calculation or inference is sound, stays with the expert (Fed. R. Evid. 702). The expert reviews, edits, independently verifies, adopts, and signs.

If any section was assisted by an AI model, the report includes an appendix that discloses each AI-assisted section, the model and version used, and the exact evidence the tool was given for it. The record is generated automatically from a tamper-evident log (each entry is cryptographically linked to the one before it, so a later edit or deletion can be detected). If a section used no AI, the disclosure says so.

This is intended to put a methodology record in the file in advance, rather than reconstructing it from memory if the expert's AI use is later examined in discovery or on cross.

That record can be checked independently. If the expert provides the disclosure manifest, anyone (including opposing counsel) can confirm it was not altered after it was made at disclosed.app/verify: the hash chain is recomputed in the browser, with no account and nothing uploaded.

During early access, the product is limited to its fictional worked example and properly de-identified material. Original document bytes are read in the browser; confirmed text is sent to the Disclosed. server and, when AI is enabled, to Anthropic under standard API retention of up to 30 days. Zero-data-retention and final counsel-reviewed terms are not yet in place, so the expert should not submit a real matter, privileged material, protected health information, or material under a protective order.

Admissibility and the sufficiency of any disclosure are always the court's determination. The tool is designed to support a defensible methodology and to disclose AI use; it does not and cannot guarantee that a report is admissible or that a particular disclosure satisfies a particular court.

If you want AI use disclosed on your matters, it helps to say so up front. You're welcome to forward this page to any expert you retain, or to use a line like this in your engagement letter:

“If you use any AI assistance in preparing your report on this matter, I'll want a disclosure record of how it was used. Disclosed. produces one automatically, and it can be independently verified.”

Send your expert the overview →

Reach us through the same contact your expert used, or via the address we use to reply to a waitlist request. We're glad to walk through the disclosure format with you before it appears in a filed report.